A studio of forty prices itself out
Enterprise research platforms quote per seat and keep education pricing behind a sales call. By the time a number reaches the department, the term has started.
Research platforms quote per seat and keep education pricing behind a sales call, so information architecture and usability end up taught from slide decks and paper cards. Veritio gives a whole cohort every method, on terms a department can approve.
One license covers the full module. No tool changes at week seven.
The gap is not curriculum or capability. It is access, and it closes in three predictable ways.
Enterprise research platforms quote per seat and keep education pricing behind a sales call. By the time a number reaches the department, the term has started.
A fourteen-day trial cannot carry a fourteen-week module. Students lose access to their own data somewhere around the midpoint review.
Card sorting becomes sticky notes on a wall, tree testing gets skipped, and evaluative testing never produces a number a student can defend at a jury.
Design research methods, information architecture, usability engineering, and the graduation project. Each one maps to a study a student can run this week and defend at the next review.
Thirteen question types including NPS, matrix, ranking, semantic differential, and constant sum, with branching logic, screening questions, and quotas.
A screened sample and clean response data, cross-tabulated with chi-square or Fisher's exact and Cramér's V.
Open and closed sorts across a full cohort, analysed the way the literature does it rather than through a single opaque score.
A similarity matrix, a dendrogram (Ward or UPGMA), and a PCA plot the student has to read and defend.
Validate the structure the card sort produced, task by task, before anything gets designed.
Findability and directness scores, lostness per task, a pie-tree, and the actual paths participants took.
Test any deployed URL with no code, or install a snippet on a live site for the studio's industry project.
Click maps, misclick and backtrack rates, time on task, plus session replays and exportable video clips.
Put two design directions in front of real people instead of settling the argument in the crit room.
A design comparison with chi-square, a p-value and a confidence level, plus first-click heat maps with area-of-interest overlays.
A graduation project can run several studies across a year and keep every result in one workspace.
An AI insight report, a password-protected results link for the guide and jury, and CSV or PDF exports for the document.
Industry tools optimise for a fast answer. A course needs the method visible, the data portable, and the access predictable for the length of the term.
Dendrograms, PCA, similarity matrices, findability and lostness, chi-square, Fisher's exact, Cramér's V. The method stays visible, so it can be taught, questioned, and graded rather than taken on faith.
One platform covers the whole syllabus, from framing a sample in week one to a jury deliverable in week fourteen. No stitching together three vendors and three logins.
Veritio is AGPL-3.0. HCI and computer science students can read how findability and clustering are computed, and a department that needs participant data on university infrastructure can run its own instance.
Access runs with the semester or the academic year instead of a rolling contract, and there are no per-response fees, so students can iterate rather than ration their sample.
There is no good tier and better tier. Every education license unlocks the whole platform with no response caps, because a class cannot be told to ration its sample. The only variable is how many students need an account.
Paid plans cap at 100 responses. A studio collecting data all term does not, so education licenses have no cap at all.
Every student can have several studies running at once without anyone archiving work to free up a slot.
Card sort, tree test, survey, first-click, first impression, prototype test, and live website test. Nothing is held back for a higher tier.
Record real sessions, replay them with an event timeline, and export the moments that matter for a crit or a jury.
Generate insight reports, and let the study ask each participant a tailored follow-up. Runs on your own AI key.
Student teams co-edit a study and share one results workspace, with roles, permissions, and comments.
Seats can be topped up if enrolment grows mid-term, so start from the closest match rather than rounding up.
One course running a research module for a single cohort.
Request accessSeveral courses and teaching staff across one programme.
Request accessA whole school of design, or every programme that needs it.
Request accessA license ends on a fixed date, one semester or one academic year, not on a rolling renewal. It is invoiced against a purchase order rather than billed to a card, and it never behaves like a trial.
Individual students outside a licensed cohort can run studies on a standard plan, with a free trial and no card required.
Provisioning a cohort is an administrative task, not a negotiation. Most courses go from first email to working accounts inside a week.
Institution, programme, course name, cohort size, and when the term starts. One form, and we come back with the shape that fits.
We confirm the programme, raise an invoice or accept a purchase order, and have every student account ready before week one.
Teaching staff get a walkthrough of each method and a semester plan you can adapt to your own module structure.
Faculty, course coordinators, and programme heads can request access here. We reply with a quote for your cohort, the invoice or purchase order form, and a provisioning date.
Straight answers, including the places where Veritio does less than the alternatives.
No. Free academic tiers elsewhere come with seat queues, verification waits, and an upgrade conversation the moment a real cohort shows up. Education access is paid, priced per term rather than per seat, and quoted against your actual cohort size so the access lasts the whole module.
No, Veritio has no participant panel. Students recruit by sharing a study link, or by importing their own contact list, with screening questions and quotas to control who qualifies. In a teaching context that is usually the point: finding and screening the right users is part of the method being assessed.
You send us the cohort size and we provision the workspace before the term begins. Students sign in with their institutional email and work inside the shared cohort workspace, individually or in project teams.
Yes. Veritio is open source under AGPL-3.0, so a department that needs participant data to stay on university infrastructure can host its own instance. Deployment and upgrade support is included on the Campus tier.
Yes. Card payment is available if it is simpler, but education access is built for institutional procurement: we issue an invoice against a purchase order and can supply the tax and vendor documentation your finance office needs.
Yes. Studies and results export as CSV, and insight reports export as PDF, so a student can carry the evidence into a portfolio, a thesis document, or a jury presentation after the access period closes.
Not yet. Figma prototype import is in development. Prototype testing today works by pasting any deployed URL, which covers a published Figma site, a Framer or Webflow build, or anything a student ships from Lovable, v0, Bolt, or Replit.
Usually yes. Continuing education providers and design bootcamps running a taught research module qualify on the same terms. Tell us the programme and the cohort size in the form and we will confirm.
Send us the course and the cohort size. We will have the workspace ready before your first studio session.
Semester and academic-year terms. Invoice or purchase order. Self-hosting available.